Abstract

To evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of catheter-mediated direct-current (DC) or radio-frequency (RF) ablation in patients with free wall accessory atrioventricular pathways, 95 patients with free wall accessory atrioventricular pathway-mediated tachyarrhythmias underwent catheter ablation. Immediately after ablation, 27 of 30 accessory pathways (90%) were ablated successfully with DC, but 2 of the 27 had early return of conduction and received a second ablation session; 3 of 8 (38%) and 57 of 62 (92%) accessory pathways were ablated successfully with RF through a small-tip (2 mm) and a large-tip (4 mm) electrode catheter, respectively. Complications in DC ablation included transient hypotension (2 patients) and pulmonary air-trapping (2 patients) and in RF ablation, cardiac tamponade (1 patient) and suspicious aortic dissection (1 patient); myocardial injury and proarrhythmic effects were more severe in DC ablation. Procedure and radiation exposure time were significantly longer in RF ablation (DC, 3.6 ± 0.2 hours, 34 ± 4 minutes; RF 4.2 ± 0.5 hours, 50 ± 10 minutes). This study confirms that RF ablation is associated with little morbidity and few complications, and RF ablation with a large-tip electrode catheter is an effective and relatively safe nonsurgical method for treatment of free wall accessory atrioventricular pathway-mediated tachyarrhythmias.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.