Comparison of direct vision and video imaging during bronchoscopy for pediatric airway foreign bodies

Abstract

Rigid ventilation bronchoscopy is a most useful means of detecting and removing foreign bodies in the airway. We performed a retrospective study of 114 children who had undergone such a procedure during a 12-year period. During bronchoscopy, 48 of these patients had been examined under direct vision and 66 by videotape recording. We found that the positive rate on first-look direct vision was 93.8% and the positive rate on first-look video imaging was 89.4%. The lower positive rate during the first-look examination by video imaging might be attributable to the facts that it is safer and that it provides a better visual field, which can encourage operators to choose video ventilation bronchoscopy, either as a diagnostic or therapeutic tool. In addition, three foreign-body-negative patients in the direct-vision group under-went a second procedure, and a foreign body was found in all three. Only one of the video-imaging patients under-went a second procedure, and no foreign body was found. The difference in the positive rates after the second procedure was statistically significant (p < 0.05). This might be attributable to the higher success rate with video imaging following the first procedure, which significantly reduced the need for a second look and the possibility of overlooked or residual foreign bodies. The condition of the mucosa postprocedurally was described in every case after video imaging but after only 41.7% of the direct-vision cases--a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Video imaging provides the physician with a clear, magnified view of the area under examination. It allows for later review of the videotape when necessary, and it reduces the risk that residual foreign-body material will remain in the airway.