Comparison of difficulty in stair ascent and descent after total knee replacement.

Abstract

[Purpose] Although many studies have shown that patients have difficulty in climbing or descending stairs after undergoing total knee replacement, no study so far has compared the difficulty of stair ascent and descent based on objective indicators. This study compared stair ascending and descending processes based on three indicators and clarified which was more difficult. [Participants and Methods] We defined 1) movement method, 2) the necessity for handrail use, and 3) speed as objective indicators. Seventy-eight patients who underwent total knee replacement participated in this study. Three months after the surgery, we examined 1) whether the patients could ascend or descend in a step-over-step or step-by-step manner, 2) whether the patients required handrail support, and measured 3) the time required to ascend and descend for four steps. [Results] The step-by-step movement and handrail requirement rates associated with stair descent were higher than the corresponding rates associated with stair ascent. In addition, the time required for stair descent was greater than that required for ascent. [Conclusion] We found that stair descent was more challenging than stair ascent in terms of all three objective indices: movement method, handrail use, and speed. The results indicate that rehabilitation after total knee replacement should focus more on stair descent than on stair ascent.