Abstract

AbstractThe dead space model of non‐local impact ionization has been developed independently by three different research groups in order to include a ‘soft’ dead space. This paper seeks to compare these models for the first time. The models are fitted to Monte Carlo simulation data (both non‐local ionization coefficients and the ionization pathlength pdf) and it is found that there are no significant differences between the models except that the Liverpool model cannot be used to fit one data set which has a very soft dead space. Likewise the models give very similar results when used to calculate the excess noise factor for low noise avalanche photodiodes. (© 2011 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.