Abstract

Abstract DNA from Burkholderia cepacia was prepared from suspensions of pure cultures and artificially contaminated waste water. The efficacy of four standard methods (lysis buffer containing proteinase K, phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol extraction, microwave treatment, heat treatment) and six commercially available kits (Puregene ®, High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit ®, InstaGene ®, QIAamp Tissue Kit ®, DNAzol ®, Elu-Quik ®) was compared in terms of sensitivity in a subsequent PCR. The results showed that a simple and inexpensive procedure using a lysis buffer containing proteinase K was superior to all other methods tested.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call