Abstract

The manual review of an electroencephalogram (EEG) for seizure detection is a laborious and error-prone process. Thus, automated seizure detection based on machine learning has been studied for decades. Recently, deep learning has been adopted in order to avoid manual feature extraction and selection. In the present study, we systematically compared the performance of different combinations of input modalities and network structures on a fixed window size and dataset to ascertain an optimal combination of input modalities and network structures. The raw time-series EEG, periodogram of the EEG, 2D images of short-time Fourier transform results, and 2D images of raw EEG waveforms were obtained from 5-s segments of intracranial EEGs recorded from a mouse model of epilepsy. A fully connected neural network (FCNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), and convolutional neural network (CNN) were implemented to classify the various inputs. The classification results for the test dataset showed that CNN performed better than FCNN and RNN, with the area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristics curves ranging from 0.983 to 0.984, from 0.985 to 0.989, and from 0.989 to 0.993 for FCNN, RNN, and CNN, respectively. As for input modalities, 2D images of raw EEG waveforms yielded the best result with an AUC of 0.993. Thus, CNN can be the most suitable network structure for automated seizure detection when applied to the images of raw EEG waveforms, since CNN can effectively learn a general spatially-invariant representation of seizure patterns in 2D representations of raw EEG.

Highlights

  • The manual review of an electroencephalogram (EEG) for seizure detection is a laborious and errorprone process

  • The false positive (FP) numbers decreased in the order of the fully connected neural network (FCNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), and 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) as 55,695.8 ± 2,377.05, 25,349.8 ± 1,464.69, and 13,314.8 ± 610.87 [F(2, 12) = 175.2, p < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)], respectively (Fig. 5b)

  • When the FCNN, RNN, and 1D CNN were applied to periodogram results (Fig. 6a), the pattern was more complex

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The manual review of an electroencephalogram (EEG) for seizure detection is a laborious and errorprone process. These studies have been based on different deep neural network structures, such as a fully connected neural network (FCNN)[24], convolutional neural network (CNN)[22,25,26,27], and recurrent neural network (RNN)[28] These different neural networks can automatically learn discriminative features from various types of data input, including raw temporal EEG26, FFT results25, 2-dimensional (2D) representation of STFT results[29], and 2D images of raw EEG27. In the present study, we compared the performance of deep learning-based seizure detection algorithms using combinations of different input forms and network structures to systematically investigate how the input modalities and network structures can affect the characteristics of automated seizure detectors. Our classifiers were tested on a human iEEG dataset to validate the results of this study

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call