Abstract
The relative merits and domains of application of three observation techniques (atomic force microscopy, Michelson interferometry, and laser confocal microscopy with differential interference contrast microscopy) for the investigation of crystal growth kinetics are discussed in the context of protein crystallization. Growth rate measurements on the same system under identical experimental conditions using different techniques show differences up to 5-fold in growth rate and a different behavior of growth rate as a function of supersaturation. These results are discussed in terms of differences in mass transport at the crystal interface during data collection in the first case and as data processing artifacts in the second. Guidelines are provided for the selection of the optimal observation technique in crystal growth studies as a function of the specific problem under investigation, showing that AFM is best suited for nanometere-size, slow processes; LCM-DIM for nanometer−micrometer size, slow and medium...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.