Abstract

To compare the different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) proposed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), World Health Organization (WHO), and Australian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) in a 75-g, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to investigate their effects on neonatal birth weight. Healthy pregnant women were enrolled in a cohort study to undergo a 75-g OGTT during 24 to 28 weeks of pregnancy and then followed up to delivery. ADA criteria and recommendations were used for the management of patients. Among 670 pregnant women, GDM was diagnosed in 41 (6.1%), 81 (12.1%), and 126 (18.8%) on the basis of ADA, WHO, and ADIPS criteria, respectively. The kappa value was 0.38 (P<.0001) for the agreement between ADA and WHO criteria, 0.41 (P<.0001) for agreement between ADA and ADIPS criteria, and 0.64 (P<.0001) for agreement between WHO and ADIPS criteria. WHO-only "positive" women had significantly lower fasting plasma glucose (87.9 versus 102.2 mg/dL; P<.0001) and 1-hour plasma glucose levels (146.4 versus 200.5 mg/dL; P<.0001) but higher 2-hour plasma glucose levels (150.1 versus 109.1 mg/dL; P<.0001) than women diagnosed with GDM by only ADA criteria. The correlation coefficient between 1-hour glucose level and neonatal birth weight was 0.09 (P<.02). The adjusted odds ratio of macrosomia associated with GDM according to ADA criteria was 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 12). The frequency of occurrence of GDM was 6.1% in a 75-g OGTT based on ADA criteria, and there was fair agreement between ADA and WHO criteria, moderate agreement between ADA and ADIPS criteria, and strong agreement between WHO and ADIPS criteria. A modest correlation was found between the 1-hour serum glucose value and neonatal birth weight.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.