Abstract

To reduce the disturbance of train vibration to adjacent tunnels during the operation of near-distance twin tunnels, three reduction methods are proposed. In this paper, the vibration mitigation effects of steel plate (SP), concrete zone (CZ), and double liner (DL) on their tunnels and adjacent tunnels during train vibration are compared by scale model and discrete element method (DEM). The distance between twin tunnels is 0.25 D, where D (6.2 m) is the diameter of the tunnel. The results show that CZ can produce a good vibration isolation effect on the first tunnel (T1) and second tunnel (T2). At the same time, SP has a good vibration isolation effect on the liner and surroundings of T2 but has the potential to increase the dynamic characteristics of T1 surroundings. The vibration mitigation effect of the DL on T1 and T2 is the same, and the ratio of weakening effect is about 30%–50%. In summary, the most recommended vibration isolation method in practical engineering is CZ. This study provides a reference for studying the vibration mitigation effect on adjacent tunnels during operation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.