Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy between Pulse Volume Recording Parameters and Exercise-Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index in Patients with Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index above 0.9.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to clarify whether or not pulse volume recoding (PVR) parameters have screening capability equivalent to ankle-brachial pressure index after walking (Ex-ABI) for patients with 0.91 or higher ABI. Patients and Methods: The subjects were 87 patients (147 limbs) with symptoms of lower extremities with 0.91 or higher ABI. In all patients, upstroke time (UT), percentage of mean artery pressure (%MAP) of PVR and Ex-ABI were measured, and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) was concomitantly performed. Results: Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of Ex-ABI, %MAP, and UT were 0.90, 0.70, and 0.81, respectively. A significant difference was noted in AUC between Ex-ABI and %MAP (p <0.001). When the cut-off values were set at %MAP ≥45% and UT ≥180 msec, the accuracies of %MAP and UT were markedly lower than that of Ex-ABI. When the cut-off values were corrected to the values determined from the ROC curves (%MAP ≥41, UT ≥164 msec), the diagnostic accuracy of UT increased markedly. Conclusion: In patients with 0.91 or higher ABI, screening capability of PVR parameters was markedly lower than that of Ex-ABI, but UT has screening capability close to that of Ex-ABI when the cut-off value is corrected downward.