Abstract

Marine controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) is an efficient offshore hydrocarbon exploration method that has been developed during the last 18 years. Sea Bed Logging (SBL) and towed streamer electromagnetic (TSEM) are two different data acquisition systems. We compared these two methods by using 1D sensitivity modeling and 2D Occam’s inversion. Based on this research, we tested the effect of frequency, offset range, water depth, reservoir size, and reservoir depth on the detection capability of the two acquisition methods in terms of sensitivity. In order to test the methodology clearly and simply, the geological model was extremely simplified for the inversion. The effect of these parameters on resolution was checked as another purpose. To easily evaluate our inversion results, a simple quantity was employed that we called the anomaly transverse resistance ratio. In the shallow water environment, both the SBL and the TSEM systems had a good sensitivity to the high resistivity targets. However, in the deep water environment, the SBL system had a low noise floor. Then, it could provide better detectability to the deep target. The TSEM had the advantage in terms of the horizontal resolution because of the dense in-line sampling of the electric field.

Highlights

  • During the past years, the marine controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) method has been applied for hydrocarbon exploration

  • Case 3 studied the detectability with various reservoir depths

  • Sea Bed Logging (SBL) system was larger than that of the towed streamer electromagnetic (TSEM) system at 1800 m, where the Anomalous Transverse Resistance (ATR) ratio was smaller than depth, reservoir sizesystem, the two reservoirs models the two data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The marine controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) method has been applied for hydrocarbon exploration. This CSEM method distinguishes the difference between hydrocarbon-saturated rocks and water-filled rocks. The electromagnetic (EM) fields propagate into the subsurface through the sea water, and the measurements at the receivers detect the signal reflection at different locations and depths. The history and detailed description of marine CSEM have been given by MacGregor and Sinha [1], Edwards [2], Constable and Srnka [3], and MacGregor and Tomlinson [4]. In hydrocarbon asas [5].[5].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call