Abstract

Robotic positioning systems are used in a variety of chemical instruments, primarily for liquid handling purposes, such as autosamplers from vials or well plates. Here, two approaches to the design of open-source autosampler positioning systems for use with 96-well plates are described and compared. The first system, a 3-axis design similar to many low-cost 3D printers that are available on the market, is constructed using an aluminum frame and stepper motors. The other system relies upon a series of 3D printed parts to achieve movement with a series of linker arms based on Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm (SCARA) design principles. Full printer design files, assembly instructions, software, and user directions are included for both samplers. The positioning precision of the 3-axis system is better than the SCARA mechanism due to finer motor control, albeit with a slightly higher cost of materials. Based on the improved precision of this approach, the 3-axis autosampler system was used to demonstrate the generation of a segmented flow droplet stream from adjacent wells within a 96-well plate.

Highlights

  • Hardware in contextMany modern chemical instruments include the use of autosamplers to introduce samples for analysis [1], including gas chromatographs (GCs), liquid chromatographs (LCs), mass spectrometers (MSs), capillary electrophoresis (CE) instruments, and flow injection analyzers (FIAs)

  • Robotic positioning systems are used in a variety of chemical instruments, primarily for liquid handling purposes, such as autosamplers from vials or well plates

  • Additional reports of 3-axis motion systems based on 3D printers that have been adapted for chemical research include mass spectrometry sampling [9,10], matrix deposition for matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) [11], chromatographic fraction collection [12], sample preparation and injection [13], applications in thin-layer chromatography (TLC) [14,15], and nucleic acid sample processing [16,17]

Read more

Summary

Hardware in context

Many modern chemical instruments include the use of autosamplers to introduce samples for analysis [1], including gas chromatographs (GCs), liquid chromatographs (LCs), mass spectrometers (MSs), capillary electrophoresis (CE) instruments, and flow injection analyzers (FIAs). The movement of these samplers typically relies on either a 3-axis linear motion system or a 2-axis linear motion system with a third angular rotation mechanism, both with the goal of sampling specific positions in sample trays or well plates [1]. The systems are compared in terms of movement precision, and the 3-axis system is demonstrated for potential use in segmented flow microfluidic workflows

Hardware description
Design files
Bill of materials
Design file name RAMPS
V voltage reg
Build instructions for 3-Axis system
Sub-Assemblies for 3-Axis System
Raspberry Pi connections and software installation for 3-Axis system
Servomotors for SCARA system
Linkage for SCARA system
Precision comparison of autosampler designs
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call