Comparison of DEKA Arm and Body-Powered Upper Limb Prosthesis Joint Kinematics

Abstract

ObjectivesTo study the effects of advancements in upper-limb prosthesis technology on the user through biomechanical analyses at the joint level to quantitatively examine movement differences of individuals using an advanced upper-limb device, the DEKA Arm, and a conventional device, a body-powered Hosmer hook. DesignClinical measurement. SettingLaboratories at the United States Food and Drug Administration. ParticipantsConvenience sample of participants (N=14) with no upper limb disability or impairment. InterventionsAll participants were trained on either an upper limb body-powered (n=6) or DEKA Arm (n=8) bypass device. Main Outcome MeasuresParticipants completed the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JHFT) and targeted Box and Blocks Test within a motion capture framework. Task completion times and joint angle trajectories for each degree of freedom of the right elbow, right shoulder, and torso were collected and analyzed for range of motion, mean angle, maximum angle, and angle path length during each task. ResultsSignificant differences between devices were observed across metrics in at least one task for each degree of freedom. Completion times were significantly higher for DEKA users (eg, 30.51±19.29s vs 9.30±1.44s) for JHFT–simulated feeding. Some kinematic measures, such as angle path length, were significantly lower in DEKA users, with the greatest difference in the right elbow flexion path length during JHFT–Page Turning (0.29±0.14 units vs 0.11±0.04 units). ConclusionsResults from this work elucidate the effect of the device on the user’s movement approach and performance, as well as emphasizing the importance of capturing movement quality into the assessment of function for advanced prosthetic technology to fully understand and evaluate potential benefits.