Abstract
Single-cell proteomics is emerging as an important subfield in the proteomics and mass spectrometry communities, with potential to reshape our understanding of cell development, cell differentiation, disease diagnosis, and the development of new therapies. Compared with significant advancements in the "hardware" that is used in single-cell proteomics, there has been little work comparing the effects of using different "software" packages to analyze single-cell proteomics datasets. To this end, seven popular proteomics programs were compared here, applying them to search three single-cell proteomics datasets generated by three different platforms. The results suggest that MSGF+, MSFragger, and Proteome Discoverer are generally more efficient in maximizing protein identifications, that MaxQuant is better suited for the identification of low-abundance proteins, that MSFragger is superior in elucidating peptide modifications, and that Mascot and X!Tandem are better for analyzing long peptides. Furthermore, an experiment with different loading amounts was carried out to investigate changes in identification results and to explore areas in which single-cell proteomics data analysis may be improved in the future. We propose that this comparative study may provide insight for experts and beginners alike operating in the emerging subfield of single-cell proteomics.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
