Comparison of Cutting Balloon vs Stenting Alone in Small Branch Ostial Lesions of Native Coronary Arteries.

Abstract

Angioplasty of small vessels is associated with a higher rate of restenosis, even in the ostium. The present study compared the acute, late results of cutting balloon vs those of stenting alone in small branch ostial lesions of native coronary arteries and the effect on the parent vessel. The study group comprised 61 patients with successful angioplasty of smaller branch ostial lesions in native coronary arteries. The reference vessel diameter was between 2.5 and 3.0 mm. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group I (cutting balloon, n=30) and group II (stenting alone, n=31). After intervention, patients in group II achieved significant acute lumen gain, larger minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and less diameter stenosis. At 3-month follow-up, the MLD and diameter stenosis of the 2 groups were almost identical; however, late loss was lower in group I. At the 6-month follow up, the cumulative restenosis rate was 41% (11/27) in group I compared with 63% (19/31) in group II (p=0.05), and the target lesion revascularization was also lower in the cutting balloon group [29% (8/27) vs 53% (16/30) p=0.05]. In group 1, the MLD of the parent vessel did not change before, after cutting balloon or at follow-up. In contrast, there were significant reductions in parent vessel MLD following stenting alone and at follow-up. Plaque shift did not occur in the cutting balloon group. Cutting balloon angioplasty is a feasible approach for the treatment of small branch ostial lesions and does not cause significant narrowing of the parent vessel.