Comparison of cultural methods and DNA probe analyses for the detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides gingivalis, and Bacteroides intermedius in subgingival plaque samples.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare DNA probe analyses to cultural methods for detecting three periodontal pathogens, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides gingivalis, and Bacteroides intermedius, in human subgingival plaque. Subgingival sites from patients diagnosed as either healthy or showing evidence of gingivitis or juvenile or adult periodontitis were sampled using two paper points. The number of these pathogens from one paper point was determined using microbiologic media and speciated by biochemical tests. Results were then compared to bacterial numbers obtained from the other paper point using species-specific DNA probes. In 60 samples from the disease group, DNA probe analysis demonstrated 100% effectiveness in detecting A. actinomycetemcomitans and B. intermedius and 91% effectiveness in detecting B. gingivalis at culture positive levels (greater than or equal to 10(3) cells). In addition, probe assays frequently identified these pathogens in samples that were culture negative. Probe analysis revealed a better correlation between presence of a pathogen and clinical evidence of disease on an individual patient basis. In contrast, most samples taken from sites of healthy individuals showed undetectable levels of all three pathogens as determined by both techniques. These results suggest that DNA probe technology is at least equivalent and often superior to cultural methods for detecting A. actinomycetemcomitans, B. gingivalis, and B. intermedius in human subgingival plaque samples.