Abstract

BackgroundTo compare computed tomography (CT) with co-registered positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) as the basis for delineating gross tumor volume (GTV) in unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC).MethodsFourteen patients with unresectable LAPC had both CT and PET images acquired. For each patient, two three-dimensional conformal plans were made using the CT and PET-CT fusion data sets. We analyzed differences in treatment plans and doses of radiation to primary tumors and critical organs.ResultsChanges in GTV delineation were necessary in 5 patients based on PET-CT information. In these patients, the average increase in GTV was 29.7%, due to the incorporation of additional lymph node metastases and extension of the primary tumor beyond that defined by CT. For all patients, the GTVCT versus GTVPET-CT was 92.5 ± 32.3 cm3 versus 104.5 ± 32.6 cm3 (p = 0.009). Toxicity analysis revealed no clinically significant differences between two plans with regard to doses to critical organs.ConclusionCo-registration of PET and CT information in unresectable LAPC may improve the delineation of GTV and theoretically reduce the likelihood of geographic misses.

Highlights

  • To compare computed tomography (CT) with co-registered positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) as the basis for delineating gross tumor volume (GTV) in unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC)

  • Co-registration of PET and CT information in unresectable LAPC may improve the delineation of GTV and theoretically reduce the likelihood of geographic misses

  • There was a need to change in both GTV and planning target volume (PTV) based on PET information in all of the patients, this need was more prominent in 5 (35.7%) of them

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To compare computed tomography (CT) with co-registered positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) as the basis for delineating gross tumor volume (GTV) in unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). 45% of those patients present with metastatic disease, the remaining 40% present with unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). These patients still have a theoretical chance for cure with non-surgical treatment, such as systemic chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (RT) [2,3]. An obvious way to reduce geographic misses in pancreatic carcinoma is through a more accurate definition of RT target volumes. It is desirable to supplement CT when defining gross tumor volume (GTV) and its subsequent expansion to planning target volume (PTV)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call