Abstract

Surface sealants are widely used in orthodontic practice to avoid enamel decalcifications in patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances. While their clinical benefit was tested in several studies, their biocompatibility has been evaluated to alesser extent. Therefore, the aim of this randomized prospective study was to evaluate possible adverse biological effects of three commonly used surface sealants and abonding primer on gingival tissues by analysing cytokines in crevicular fluid of orthodontic patients after the application of surface sealants. Asingle centre parallel trial was conducted. Using asplit-mouth design quadrants of 15patients requiring orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances were randomized to one of three commonly used surface sealants (Pro Seal®, Opal®Seal™, Protecto®CaF2Nano) and abonding primer (Transbond™ XT). Interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-10 levels in crevicular fluids of the individual quadrants were assessed at four different time points (before application, and at 30, 60 and 90 min after application). In all, 60quadrants of 15patients were randomized (Pro Seal® n = 15, Opal®Seal™ n = 15, Protecto®CaF2Nano n = 15, Transbond™ XT n = 15) and analysed. No significant changes for IL-8 or IL-10 levels in crevicular fluid after the application of surface sealants or bonding primer were detected. However, interpatient variability was high. No further clinical side effects were detected. Commonly used pre-bonding surface sealants (Pro Seal®, Opal®Seal™) do not appear to have asignificant impact on inflammatory cytokines levels of crevicular fluid and do not appear to contribute to sensitization or hypersensitivity events.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call