Comparison of coronary hemodynamics in patients with internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts: A noninvasive approach using combined two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography

Abstract

Blood flow in bypass grafts and recipient left anterior descending coronary arteries was evaluated with combined two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in 15 patients with an internal mammary artery graft and in 24 patients with a saphenous vein graft. Comparative studies of coronary hemodynamics were also performed regarding these two different grafting techniques.The graft vessel was detected in 11 (79%) of 14 patients with an internal mammary artery graft and in 20 (87%) of 23 with a saphenous vein graft. The recipient left anterior descending coronary artery was detected in 10 (67%) of the former group and 17 (71%) of the latter. The blood flow patterns obtained were generally biphasic, consisting of systolic and diastolic phases with higher velocity during diastole. The maximal diastolic flow velocity in internal mammary artery grafts was much higher than that in saphenous vein grafts. In patients with an internal mammary artery graft, the flow pattern characteristics within the recipient coronary artery were quite similar to those within the arterial graft, and flow velocities within the recipient coronary artery and the arterial graft were quantitatively almost identical. This outcome may contribute to the long-term patency seen in internal mammary artery grafts.On the other hand, the flow velocity in saphenous vein grafts was fairly low throughout the cardiac cycle. Flow velocity in the recipient coronary artery in patients with a saphenous vein graft was accelerated only in early diastole. As a result, the recipient coronary artery flow pattern and velocity differed substantially from those in the saphenous vein graft. Internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts showed average diastolic peak flow velocity of 57.7 ± 9.9 and 28.0 ± 8.9 cm/s, respectively, compared with 55.1 ± 7.2 and 93.5 ± 14.7 cm/s, respectively, in the recipient coronary arteries with artery grafts and vein grafts.Thus, the Doppler method allowed us to evaluate not only the direct effects of bypass grafting on the coronary circulation, but also the differences in effects between these two different grafting techniques.