Abstract

To compare corneal wetting performances of different dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices. Three different types of dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose %2 (HPMC), sodium hyaluronate %3-sodium chondroitin sulphate %4 (HACS), and sodium hyaluronate %3 (HA), were applied on corneal surfaces of 10 healthy volunteer subjects repeatedly at 3 different time points. Corneal wetting properties of the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices were compared qualitatively and quantitatively by anterior segment optical coherence tomography for 30 minutes. Sodium hyaluronate 3% and HACS applications had a higher mean precorneal ophthalmic viscosurgical device thickness than HPMC application at all time points (seventh minute HPMC: 105.2 ± 25.3 μm, HA: 561.4 ± 115.8 μm, HACS: 481.2 ± 55 μm, P < 0.001). All HPMC applications were terminated by the 12th minute because of insufficient corneal wetting. Mean survival estimate time was significantly shortest for HPMC (11.5 ± 0.5 minutes, P < 0.001) and longest for HA (29.7 ± 0.28 minutes). It was slightly shorter for HACS (26.9 ± 0.87 minutes, P = 0.007) than the HA application. Sodium hyaluronate 3% and HACS provide superior corneal covering compared with HPMC with an effect that can be maintained up to 30 minutes. They may be an effective option for corneal wetting during long vitreoretinal surgeries with longer duration of effect and fever number of applications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.