Abstract

A complex simulation model of a heavy duty truck, including an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) based waste heat recovery system and a vehicle cooling system, was applied to determine the system fuel economy potential in a typical drive cycle. Measures to increase the system performance were investigated and a comparison between two different cooling system designs was derived. The base design, which was realized on a Mercedes-Benz Actros vehicle revealed a fuel efficiency benefit of 2.6%, while a more complicated design would generate 3.1%. Furthermore, fully transient simulation results were performed and are compared to steady state simulation results. It is shown that steady state simulation can produce comparable results if averaged road data are used as boundary conditions.

Highlights

  • Truck manufacturers develop more efficient propulsion technologies to enable low total cost of ownership to their customers and because of imminent legal CO2 limits

  • The temperatures, are very different. This leads to a significant mismatch reached up to 103 ◦ C under full cooling system load conditions and very cold temperature at low load

  • The exhaust flap was used to limit the heat input into the system. This could be necessary if the expander generator was at its power limit, or if the cooling system was stressed to an extent that fan and coolant pump would consume more parasitic power than the exhaust heat recovery (EHR) system could provide

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Truck manufacturers develop more efficient propulsion technologies to enable low total cost of ownership to their customers and because of imminent legal CO2 limits. Wilhelm Maybach (Stuttgart, Germany) in 1904 was the first to attempt a realization It failed because the pressure losses in the exhaust heat exchanger were so high that the overall fuel consumption was higher with steam cycle than without [5]. On the cooling air side, the vehicle regarded by them is different from the Actros The models of both cooling system approaches were stimulated with the same real-live test data, recorded with an Actros production vehicle on a route between Stuttgart and Hamburg, Germany. Both models ran at the same constant ambient temperature of 15 ◦ C. The overall weight of the vehicle was 40 t, and it was equipped with a hybrid powertrain that allowed the electrical integration of the expander into the powertrain

Description of the Vehicle Setup
Comparison
Floating
Description of the Simulation Model
Exhaust Evaporator Model
Exhaust Gas Recirculation Evaporator Model
Condenser
Expander
Ideal inner expansion with under
Working
Split Valve Model
Radiator
Charge
Air Flow through the Radiator Package and Fan Model
3.10. Thermostat Model
3.11. Thermal Engine Model
Description of the Control Strategy
Fan and Engine Coolant Pump
Steady State Simulation
Full Transient Simulation
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.