Abstract

BackgroundA new generation of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) was recently introduced using silicon (Si) photomultiplier (PM)-based technology. Our aim was to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of a SiPM-based PET-CT (Discovery MI; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a time-of-flight PET-CT scanner with a conventional PM detector (Gemini TF; Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, USA), including reconstruction algorithms per vendor’s recommendations.MethodsImaging of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association IEC body phantom and 16 patients was carried out using 1.5 min/bed for the Discovery MI PET-CT and 2 min/bed for the Gemini TF PET-CT. Images were analysed for recovery coefficients for the phantom, signal-to-noise ratio in the liver, standardized uptake values (SUV) in lesions, number of lesions and metabolic TNM classifications in patients.ResultsIn phantom, the correct (> 90%) activity level was measured for spheres ≥17 mm for Discovery MI, whereas the Gemini TF reached a correct measured activity level for the 37-mm sphere. In patient studies, metabolic TNM classification was worse using images obtained from the Discovery MI compared those obtained from the Gemini TF in 4 of 15 patients. A trend toward more malignant, inflammatory and unclear lesions was found using images acquired with the Discovery MI compared with the Gemini TF, but this was not statistically significant. Lesion-to-blood-pool SUV ratios were significantly higher in images from the Discovery MI compared with the Gemini TF for lesions smaller than 1 cm (p < 0.001), but this was not the case for larger lesions (p = 0.053). The signal-to-noise ratio in the liver was similar between platforms (p = 0.52). Also, shorter acquisition times were possible using the Discovery MI, with preserved signal-to-noise ratio in the liver.ConclusionsImage quality was better with Discovery MI compared to conventional Gemini TF. Although no gold standard was available, the results indicate that the new PET-CT generation will provide potentially better diagnostic performance.

Highlights

  • A new generation of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-Computed tomography (CT)) was recently introduced using silicon (Si) photomultiplier (PM)-based technology

  • Using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU-22012 standard [3], Hsu et al [4] found that Silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based Positron emission tomography (PET) cameras have greater sensitivity and time resolution compared to conventional PM-based PET cameras

  • The aim of this study was to compare the quality and diagnostic performance of images obtained from a novel SiPM-based PET system (Discovery MI; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), using the Bayesian penalizedlikelihood reconstruction algorithm (Q.Clear), with those obtained from a conventional PM-based PET system with time-of-flight (Gemini TF; Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, USA), using the line-of-response row-action maximum-likelihood algorithm, in phantom and patients undergoing clinical positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning with 18F-FDG

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A new generation of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) was recently introduced using silicon (Si) photomultiplier (PM)-based technology. A new generation of PET-CT scanners has recently been introduced, and they use silicon (Si) photomultiplier (PM)-based technology. This technology has the potential to increase the detection of pathology, primarily through greater sensitivity. Using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU-22012 standard [3], Hsu et al [4] found that SiPM-based PET cameras have greater sensitivity and time resolution compared to conventional PM-based PET cameras. Two other studies comparing SiPM-based PET-CT to conventional PET-CT found the SiPM-based PET-CT performed better and detected a greater number of lesions [5, 6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.