Abstract
Reports on a comparison by computer simulation between conventional periodic loading (PL) and job‐group loading (JGL). When conventional PL is used, the search of the best part input sequence must be performed in order to optimize performance of a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). JGL works, instead, as a dynamic rule for real time scheduling of FMS, defining a part releasing policy able to guarantee the reaching of a periodic steady state without non‐productive times on the bottleneck workstation. However, JGL does not assure, in some cases, the same performance arising from the optimal part input sequence of conventional PL, in terms of non‐productive times in FMS filling and emptying phases, work in progress and throughput time. The paper demonstrates that using any JGL rule or the best PL part input sequence gives rise to negligible differences in FMS performance. Furthermore, the dynamic capabilities of the JGL also allow for spontaneously restoring the FMS periodic steady state without non‐productive times after any transient, for instance when production mix changes occur.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.