Comparison of cone and OSU calorimetric techniques to assess the flammability behaviour of fabrics used for aircraft interiors

Abstract

AbstractTwo test methods for measuring the heat release rate, HRR have been compared on fabric composites used for aircraft interior materials as side‐wall panels. These methods are based on the principles of direct measurement of the convective and radiant heat by thermopiles using an Ohio State University (OSU) calorimeter, and oxygen consumption using a cone calorimeter. It has been observed when tested by standard procedures, cone results at 35 kW/m2 incident heat flux do not correlate with OSU results at the same heat flux. This is because in the cone calorimeter, the sample is mounted horizontally whereas the OSU calorimetric method requires vertical sampling with exposure to a vertical radiant panel. A further difference between the two techniques is the ignition source—in the cone it is spark ignition, whereas in the OSU it is flame ignition; hence, samples in the OSU calorimeter ignite more easily compared to those in the cone under the same incident heat fluxes. However, in this paper we demonstrate that cone calorimetric exposure at 50 kW/m2 heat flux gives similar peak heat release results as the 35 kW/m2 heat flux of OSU calorimeter, but significantly different average and total heat release values over a 2 min period. The performance differences associated with these two techniques are also discussed. Moreover, the effects of structure, i.e. type of fibres used in warp/weft direction and design of fabric are also analysed with respect to heat release behaviour and their correlation discussed. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.