Comparison of condylar position after free fibular flap mandibular reconstruction using computer-assisted and traditional techniques

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare the changes in condylar position after mandibular reconstruction with free fibular flap(FFF) and the differences between computer-assisted techniques and traditional methods on CT images.MethodsThirty-four patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction with free fibular flap were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the 3D group, virtual surgical planning (VSP) with osteotomy cutting plate and placement guiding plate were used, while the traditional group underwent freehand reconstruction. The CT data of 68 temporomandibular joints (TMJs) were recorded before and immediately after surgery. The condylar position was evaluated by measuring the anterior space (AS), posterior space (PS) and superior space (SS), and the ln (PS/AS) was calculated according to the method proposed by Pullinger and Hollender.ResultsIn the patients included in the 3D group, the condyle on the ipsilateral side moved slightly backward; however, in the patients in the traditional group, the ipsilateral side moved considerably anteroinferior. No obvious changes on the contralateral side were noted. In the 3D group, 33% of ipsilateral condyles were in the posterior position postoperatively when compared with the preoperative position (13%). In the traditional group, the number of ipsilateral condyles in the anterior position increased from 4 to 10, accounting for 53% postoperatively. Contrary to the traditional group, the 3D group presented less condylar displacement on the ipsilateral side postoperatively.ConclusionsThis study showed a decreased percentage of change in condylar position postoperatively when VSP was used. Virtual surgical planning improved the accuracy of FFF mandibular reconstruction and made the condylar position more stable.