Abstract
Purpose. To comprehensively compare four computed tomography (CT) scanner shielding design methods using RadShield, a Java-based graphical user interface (GUI). Methods. RadShield, a floor plan based GUI, was extended to calculate air kerma and barrier thickness using accepted methods from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the British Institute of Radiology, and a method using isodose maps, for spatially distributed points beyond user defined barriers. For a stationary CT scanner, the overall shielding recommendations found using RadShield were also compared to those found by American Board of Radiology certified diagnostic medical physicists using the conventional NCRP dose length product method and the isodose map method. Results. The results between methods differed significantly for calculation point locations beyond the gantry and to the rear of the gantry. Overall shielding design recommendations across the four methods yielded similar average air kerma and thickness values for the barriers. Conclusions. RadShield was extended to perform CT shielding design and proved reliable using four methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
