Comparison of Complications and Visual Outcomes of Combined Phacovitrectomy versus Standalone Phacoemulsification: A Multicenter Database Study.

Abstract

To compare the rates of intraoperative complications, cystoid macular edema (CME), and visual outcomes in eyes that underwent combined phacovitrectomy (Phaco-PPV) to those with standalone phacoemulsification. A multicenter database study across 8 ophthalmology departments in the United Kingdom. Retrospective, nonrandomized, multicenter comparative study. We extracted data for patients who underwent Phaco-PPV and standalone phacoemulsification from January 2000 through May 2015. The primary study outcomes were the rates of intraoperative complications and CME after surgery. The study included 2222 eyes in the combined Phaco-PPV group and 112689 in the standalone phacoemulsification group. The combined Phaco-PPV group had a higher incidence of posterior capsule rupture (2.7% vs. 1.7%), dropped lens fragments (0.5% vs. 0.2%), suprachoroidal hemorrhage (0.4% vs. 0.1%), and cystoid macular edema (3.6 vs. 1.1%) (P<0.001). The mean preoperative visual acuity (VA) was lower in the combined Phaco-PPV group, with a mean VA of 0.98 vs 0.68 logMAR (Snellen ∼20/200 vs. 20/100) in the standalone phacoemulsification group (P<0.001). Visual acuity at 24 weeks was lower in the combined Phaco-PPV group (mean VA 0.67 vs. 0.22 logMAR (Snellen ∼20/100 vs. 20/32), P<0.001). Combined Phaco-PPV had higher rates of intraoperative complications and CME, along with a lower postoperative visual acuity when compared to standalone phacoemulsification surgery.