Comparison of complications and degree of correction between the extensile lateral and sinus tarsi approaches in the treatment of calcaneus fractures: a cross-sectional observational retrospective study

Abstract

Introduction: Calcaneus fractures are a challenge for traumatologists. Their complex anatomy, relative scarcity of surrounding soft tissue, and long learning curve for surgical treatment partly explain the difficulties encountered by surgeons, in addition to contributing to the high rate of complications. Objective: This study aimed to identify the differences in complication rates and degree of correction between extensile lateral access (ELA) and sinus tarsi (STA) approaches by reviewing medical records between 2018 and 2023 of patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneus fractures at a hospital in the interior of São Paulo. Methods: The present study followed a retrospective observational and cross-sectional model (STROBE). The Kolmogorov Smirnov test, Student-t test, Wilcoxon Rank test, Mann-Whitney test, Pearson Chi-Square test, and binary and predictive logistic regression analysis were used, adopting a confidence risk of 0.05. Results and Conclusion: A total of 77 patients were included (52 ELA and 25 STA). It was concluded that no statistical differences were observed after intergroup comparisons (ELA vs. STA). There was also no statistically significant influence of the predictor “age” on the predictors of the responses “Böhler and Gissane angles in degrees” in the final post-procedure phase. In general, STA presented a lower probability of complications with the use of the sinus tarsi route, reaching the same level of joint reduction and control of progression to osteoarthritis. All these results of the present study almost completely confirm the literary findings that appear under discussion.