Abstract
A competitive reverse transcription (RT)-nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for HCV RNA was compared with the Roche Amplicor HCV Monitor assay, based on non-competitive, single step RT-PCR. A total of 83 serum samples were tested in parallel by both assays. All samples could be quantified by competitive RT-PCR (cPCR), whereas seven were negative by the non-competitive assay (ncPCR). The HCV RNA titre of the discordant samples assessed by cPCR was significantly lower than that of the remaining 76 ( P < 0.001). Absolute HCV RNA titres were higher by cPCR than by ncPCR ( P < 0.001), even if the results of the two methods were statistically correlated ( P < 0.001). HCV RNA titre tested by cPCR was not significantly different between samples infected with genotype 1 or 2. However, values obtained by ncPCR were higher in samples with genotype 1 ( P < 0.001). Furthermore, all seven discordant samples were infected with genotype 2. When both methods were used to measure serial dilutions of standard HCV RNA, we observed a bias to lower measurements with the ncPCR kit. This study shows a good correlation between the results of two PCR-based methods for the quantification HCV RNA. However, the degree of sensitivity and the absolute HCV RNA titre measured may vary according to the assay used.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.