Abstract

ABSTRACT This study compares simulations from 13 CMIP5 and CMIP6 homologous models and their multi-model ensemble (MME) based on the generalized three-cornered hat method (TCH) for temperature and precipitation over the Yarlung Tsangpo-Brahmaputra River Basin (YBRB). The results showed that: (1) the MME estimations outperform the most single model, demonstrating the effectiveness of TCH in reducing model uncertainty. (2) CMIP5 and CMIP6 are more applicable for spring and autumn maximum temperatures (Tasmax), minimum temperatures (Tasmin) and precipitation in YBRB. Moreover, they showed better performance for precipitation on floodplain, for Tasmax on Tibetan Plateau, and for Tasmin in whole YBRB. (3) Relatively, CMIP5 and CMIP6 can better simulate the spatial distribution of temperature rather than precipitation (the Temporal Correlation Coefficient of Tasmax and Tasmin: 0.72 – 0.89; that of precipitation: 0.43–0.6). (4) The bias of CMIP6 for temperature and precipitation in YBRB is mostly lower than CMIP5, but still has a cold bias over YBRB (Tasmax: −7.98 °C to −14.88 °C, Tasmin: −6.24 °C to −21.45 °C) and wet bias for precipitation on Tibetan Plateau (0.56 mm − 2.00 mm), dry bias on Himalayan belt (−0.69 mm to −7.56 mm) and floodplain (−0.46 mm to −6.98 mm).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.