Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Implantation of Foldable Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens With and Without Heparin Surface Modification in Indian Diabetic Patients.

Abstract

Background This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of a heparin surface-modified (HSM) hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lens (IOL) (CT LUCIA 601PY) and non-heparin-modified hydrophobic acrylic foldable IOL (AcrySof IQ SN60WF) in diabetic patients undergoingphacoemulsification. Methodology Thisrandomized, single-surgeon, double-masked controlled trial was conducted at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. In this randomized controlled trial, 100 eyes of 100 diabetic patients with or without mild-to-moderate diabetic retinopathy were enrolled (HSM IOL, n = 50; non-HSM IOL, n = 50). Outcome measures were aqueous flare, visual acuity, and anterior chamber depth (ACD). These were measured preoperatively as well as one day, one week, one month, three months, six months, and one year postoperatively. Results The HSM IOL group had significantly lower anterior chamber aqueous flare values (photon count/ms) than the non-HSM IOL group on postoperative day one (9.97 ± 5.2 vs. 17.56 ± 11.3, p < 0.001), postoperative week one (11.47 ± 7.78 vs. 17.06 ± 9.4, p = 0.02), and postoperative month three (7.7 ± 4.1 vs. 12.5 ± 5.6, p = 0.004) of phacoemulsification. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was significantly better in the HSM IOL group on postoperative day one (uncorrected distance visual acuity: p = 0.022; CDVA; p = 0.005), but there was no significant difference at any other follow-ups. ACD was significantly longer in the HSM IOL group at all follow-ups. Conclusions Theimplantation of HSM IOL resulted in significantly lower inflammatory reactions in the early postoperative period in diabetics.