Abstract

Aim: The choice between anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACD) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) for the treatment of cervical brachialgia is controversial. This study aimes to compare clinical outcomes between these two operative inteventions for brachialgia. Methods:Retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed. Patients receiving a primary ACD or PCF to treat brachialgia, in a single tertiary neurosurgical unit were included. Surgical details, and patient reported outcomes (COMI-Neck questionnaire) were extracted from a prospectively maintained spinal procedure database. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a change in COMI score of –2 at 12 months. The student t-test, Chi-square test, and linear regression were used to compare groups. Results:Between June 2011 ad February 2016 there were 634 ACD procedures (Median age 49; 321 Male), and 54 PCF procedures (Median age 50; 37 Male) perfomed for brachialgia. Age, ASA and pre-operative COMI were similar between the groups (p > .05). Complete outcome data was recorded at twelve months in 312 ACD and 36 PCF patients. Both ACD and PCF were associated with an improvement in COMI at 3 and 12 months (all p < .01). Mean change in COMI at 3 months was –2.38 for ACD, versus –2.31 for PCF (p = .88); at twelve months it was –2.94 for ACD, versus –2.67 for PCF (p = .55). MCID was seen in 59% of ACD cases, versus 58% of PCF cases at twelve months (p = .91). Conclusion:There was no significant difference between outcomes in the ACD and PCF groups. This is supportive of published literature. The proposed multicenter RCTs may inform further.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call