Abstract
The aim of this study was to review evidence to determine whether "pure" chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients without a history of asthma differ in the clinical characteristics, severity of airflow limitation, and clinical outcomes compared to patients with Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS). An electronic search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases to identify comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes between ACOS and "pure" COPD. The included studies were subjected to meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment using ROBINS-E tool. Eleven observational studies were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed increased expression of lung function parameters like forced expiration volume (FEV) at 1 sec{mean difference (MD) 2.36; 95% CI [0.05,4.66] ; p=0.004; I2= 72%} and clinical symptoms in terms of fever {Relative Risk (RR) 0.34, p<0.0001}, wheezing {RR 0.39, p<0.0001} and dyspnea {RR 0.53, p<0.0001}. The comorbidities associated with ACOS patients were similar to that found in patients with "pure" COPD. Interestingly, higher body mass index (BMI) was found in patients with ACOS (MD -0.73 95% CI [-1.06, -0.41], p<0.0001. The result showed higher risk in onset of frequent acute exacerbations, severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization and higher number of exacerbations experienced per year in ACOS patients. Within the limitations of the review, ACOS can be regarded as separate entity of co-existence which is classically associated with higher BMI, worsened lung function parameters and exacerbations with a varying degree of clinical symptoms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: European review for medical and pharmacological sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.