Abstract

ObjectiveAs almost any version of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was safely and efficiently applied for adults as well as children without age being a limiting risk factor, the aim of the study was to compare the different characteristics as well as the efficacy, outcome, and safety of the pediatric and adult patients who had undergone mini-PCNL (MPCNL) in a single institution.MethodsWe retrospective reviewed 331 renal units in children and 8537 renal units in adults that had undergone MPCNL for upper urinary tract stones between the years of 2000–2012. The safety, efficacy, and outcome were analyzed and compared.ResultsThe children had a smaller stone size (2.3 vs. 3.1 cm) but had smilar stone distribution (number and locations). The children required fewer percutaneous accesses, smaller nephrostomy tract, shorter operative time and less hemoglobin drop. The children also had higher initial stone free rate (SFR) (80.4% vs. 78.6%) after single session of MPCNL (p<0.05); but no difference was noted in the final SFR (94.7% vs. 93.5%) after auxiliary procedures. The complication rate (15.6% vs. 16.3%) and blood transfusion rate (3.1% vs. 2.9%) were similar in both group (p>0.05). Both groups had low rate of high grade Clavien complications. There was no grade III, IV, V complications and no angiographic embolization required in pediatric group. One important caveat, children who required multiple percutaneous nephrostomy tracts had significant higher transfusion rate than in adults (18.8% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.007).ConclusionsThis contemporary largest-scale analysis confirms that the stone-free rate in pediatric patients is at least as good as in adults without an increase of complication rates. However, multiple percutaneous nephrostomy tracts should be practiced with caution in children.

Highlights

  • Urolithiasis in children is an important health issue

  • We retrospectively reviewed the data of 8868 renal units in 7420 patients with upper urinary tract calculi who underwent one-stage MPCNL

  • Indications for MPCNL were mainly based on the stone sizes, their location, and the presence or absence of infection and hydronephrosis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urolithiasis in children is an important health issue. The optimal management of for pediatric stone disease is still evolving. The treatment should not impair the growth and function of the young kidneys. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is often utilized as the first line treatment. The long term safety of ESWL has been questioned. Due to the higher incidence of metabolic and anatomical abnormalities in the pediatric stone patients, any residual stone after ESWL can more lead to recurrence [1,2]. The other main concerns in children are to minimize the need for retreatment, and any possible treatment options to achieve a stone-free status in this age group are very important and should not be limited or precluded

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.