Abstract

Three micronebulizers, the high-efficiency nebulizer (HEN), the microconcentric nebulizer (MCN) and the micromist (MM), were compared with a conventional pneumatic concentric nebulizer working at low liquid flow rates in ICP-AES. The gas back-pressure, the free liquid aspiration rate, the drop size distribution of primary and tertiary aerosols, the solvent and analyte transport rates, the emission intensity and the limits of detection were measured. The solvent evaporation inside the spray chamber proved to be a very important transport phenomenon when working at very low liquid flow rates. The micronebulizers produced finer primary aerosols, higher solution transport rates through the spray chamber and higher sensitivities than the conventional pneumatic concentric nebulizer. The HEN used in this work provided slightly lower ICP-AES limits of detection than the other two micronebulizers, but at the expense of a higher back-pressure.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.