Comparison of cervical muscle thickness between asymptomatic women with and without forward head posture

Abstract

BackgroundForward head posture (FHP) is a forward positioning of the head relative to the trunk in the sagittal plane. This posture is one of the most prevalent poor postures in patients with head and neck pain. Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (RUSI) is a reliable method to objectively evaluate muscle thickness and function. ObjectiveTo compare thickness of cervical muscles that control both head and neck posture between asymptomatic women with and without FHP. MethodsSeventy asymptomatic women aged between 20 and 40 years, with and without FHP (35 in each group), participated in the study. The thickness of the cervical muscles (rectus capitis posterior – RCP, oblique capitis superior – OCS, semispinalis capitis – SSC, sternocleidomastoid – SCM, and longus coli – LCo) was measured using RUSI and the data was compared between the two groups. ResultsThe comparison of cervical muscle thickness between women with and without FHP revealed significant difference only with regard to the muscle thickness of the SCM muscle (mean difference: 0.7mm, 95% confidence interval of the difference: 0.14, 1.26mm, p value: 0.014). The thickness of this muscle was greater in women with FHP. ConclusionTonic contraction of the SCM muscle can lead to greater thickness of this muscle in subjects with FHP.