Comparison of cereal-based diet with purified diet by short-term feeding studies in rats, mice and hamsters, with emphasis on toxicity characteristics

Abstract

Animal diets used in toxicity studies are prepared either from natural ingredients (cereal-based diet) or from more refined products (purified diet). The type of diet may influence both the outcome of the study and the values obtained with the various parameters in test and control animals. To detect the parameters sensitive to changes in diet composition, short-term (4-wk) studies were conducted in rats, mice and hamsters fed either a cereal-based diet or the AIN-76A purified diet supplemented with vitamins and minerals at the highest recommended levels for each of the species used. Although the purified diet was more palatable to rats and showed a higher protein quality, growth rate and food intake were generally slightly higher with the cereal-based diet in each of the species examined. The haematological values of the two diet groups were generally comparable. On the cereal-based diet the production of faeces was considerably higher than on the purified diet and was accompanied by a higher weight of the caecum. These findings were attributed to the relatively high level and mixed composition of the fibre fraction in the cereal-based diet. Blood levels of cholesterol and phospholipids were clearly lower on the cereal-based diet than on the purified diet. Because the differences were probably due to the level and composition of the fibre fraction, they support the suggestion to replace the 5% cellulose of the AIN-76A diet by a higher level of a more composite but well defined source of dietary fibre.