Comparison of cardiovascular metrics on computed tomography pulmonary angiography of the updated and old diagnostic criteria for pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

In the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines, the diagnostic criteria for pulmonary hypertension (PH) included a reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of 20 mmHg (mPAP >20 mmHg). This study aimed to reassess cardiovascular metrics on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) to optimize the timely diagnosis of patients with suspected PH. Patients with suspected CTEPH who underwent CTPA and right heart catheterization (RHC) between January 2019 and December 2022 in China-Japan Friendship Hospital were retrospectively included. They were grouped into CTEPH and non-PH groups according to the new and old criteria (2022 and 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines) for the diagnosis of PH. Cardiovascular metrics including the main pulmonary artery diameter (MPAd), Cobb angle, and right ventricular free wall thickness (RVWT), among others, were measured. The correlation of these metrics with hemodynamic data was analyzed with Spearman rank correlation analysis, while the differences in cardiovascular metrics between the updated (mPAP >20 mmHg) and old PH criteria (mPAP ≥25 mmHg) were compared with independent samples t-test or the Mann-Whitney test. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for the prediction model. The study enrolled 180 patients (males n=86; age 55.5±12.0 years old). According to the old guidelines, 119 patients were placed into the PH group (mPAP ≥25 mmHg) , while according to the new guidelines, 130 patients were placed into the PH group (mPAP >20 mmHg). Cardiovascular metrics on CTPA between the updated and old guidelines were comparable (P>0.05). Compared to other metrics, an MPAd of 30.4 mm exhibited the highest area under the curve (AUC: 0.934±0.021), with a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.90. MPAd [odds ratio (OR) =1.271], transverse diameter of the right ventricle (RVtd; OR =1.176), Cobb angle (OR =1.108), and RVWT (OR =3.655) were independent factors for diagnosing CTEPH (P<0.05). Cobb angle, right and left ventricular transverse diameter ratio, and right and left ventricular area ratio moderately correlated with mPAP (r=0.586, r=0.583, r=0.629) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (r=0.613, r=0.593, r=0.642). Cardiovascular metrics on CTPA were comparable between the new and old guidelines for CTEPH diagnosis. Cardiovascular metrics on CTPA can noninvasively assess the hemodynamics of patients with CTEPH.