Comparison of bone mass measured by histomorphometry on iliac biopsy and by dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine

Abstract

In a prospective study we compared bone mass measured independently by dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) on lumbar spine and by histomorphometry on transiliac biopsy. Measurements were done in 83 patients (23 males, 60 females) with various generalized bone diseases, including spinal osteoporosis, primary hyperparathyroidism and osteopetrosis. Iliac bone density was analyzed on bone biopsy with an automatic image analyzer and expressed as the trabecular bone volume (TBV), the cortical thickness (CT) and the total bone density (TBD) which includes the density of both spongy and cortical bone within the periosteal envelope. The bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) were measured from L 2 to L 4 with a Novo Lab 22a device. For the 83 patients, there were significant correlations between values given by both methods, with r values ranging from 0.74 to 0.43, according to the bone mass parameters analyzed. In the 37 patients with untreated vertebral osteoporosis, the TBV—but not the CT nor the TBD—correlated significantly with the BMD of the spine ( r = 0.53, p < 0.001). In conclusion, there is a significant correlation between bone density of the iliac crest assessed histomorphometrically and spinal density measured by DPA. Despite the fact that DPA measures both trabecular and cortical bone of the spine, it correlates better with iliac trabecular bone mass than with the overall iliac bone density.