Comparison of bicycle, heavy isometric, dipyridamole-atropine and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of myocardial ischemia

Abstract

Several stress echocardiography (SE) modalities have been introduced for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). Exercise and dobutamine SE are considered to have better diagnostic accuracy than vasodilator or isometric SE, but there are no studies in a single group of patients comparing these 3 tests with heavy 2-arm isometric SE. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic characteristics of 4 SE methods in patients with chest pain. Altogether, 60 patients (age ± SD 55.1 ± 2.1 years) were tested with bicycle, heavy 2-arm isometric, dipyridamole-atropine and dobutamine SE. CAD (>50% stenosis) was present in 44 patients; 26 patients had 1-vessel disease. During bicycle SE, the double product at peak stress was higher than during dobutamine and dipyridamole-atropine SE (26.5 × 10 3, p <0.005 vs dobutamine and dipyridamole-atropine SE), and peak wall motion score index (1.40) was higher than during dipyridamole-atropine and isometric SE (1.26 and 1.07, respectively, p <0.05 vs bicycle SE). Bicycle , dipyridamole-atropine, and dobutamine SE had higher sensitivity than isometric SE (90%, 93%, 95%, and 30%, respectively, p <0.05 isometric SE vs others). There were no statistically significant differences with regard to specificity. Similarly, bicycle, dipyridamole-atropine, and dobutamine SE had a higher diagnostic accuracy than isometric SE (78%, 88%, 87% and 47%, respectively, p <0.05 isometric SE vs others). We conclude that bicycle, dipyridamole-atropine, and dobutamine SE have an equal diagnostic accuracy in detecting CAD despite higher double product and ischemic burden at peak stress during bicycle and dobutamine SE over dipyridamole-atropine SE. Heavy isometric SE is inaccurate.