Abstract
BackgroundBacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy using the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) maintenance protocol is the standard in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Maintenance with monthly instillations is also widely used, but evidence comparing the two maintenance protocols is scarce. ObjectiveTo compare monthly and SWOG instillation schedules in maintenance BCG therapy. Design, setting, and participantsWe retrospectively identified patients with NMIBC treated with maintenance BCG according to either the monthly or the SWOG instillation regimen in two tertiary care centers in Finland between 2009 and 2019. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisWe compared discontinuation rates of the monthly and SWOG maintenance protocols due to toxicity, and recurrence and progression rates by protocols. Baseline characteristics were compared with the Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the discontinuation of BCG due to toxicity and oncological efficacy. Results and limitationsWe identified 723 patients, of whom 545 (75%) and 178 (25%) received maintenance according to the monthly and SWOG protocols, respectively. The median follow-up time was 66 (interquartile range: 45–99) mo. In the monthly and SWOG groups, 131 (24%) and 50 (28%) patients, respectively, discontinued BCG due to toxicity, with no difference in a univariate or multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73–1.40, p = 0.940). The 5-yr recurrence-free survival rates in the monthly and SWOG groups were 65% (95% CI: 61–69%) and 71% (95% CI: 64–79%, p = 0.370), respectively. The 5-yr progression-free survival rates were 89% (95% CI: 86–92%) and 91% (95% CI: 86–96%, p = 0.240), respectively. ConclusionsMonthly maintenance is a comparable alternative to the SWOG protocol. Patient summaryIn this study, we compared two schedules of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment used in the treatment of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We found that there were no significant differences between the two instillation schedules in terms of tolerability or efficacy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.