Comparison of axial reconstructed ultrasonographic images from three‐dimensional data volumes and computed tomographic scans in the documentation and detection of liver lesions.

Abstract

To compare axial reconstructed ultrasonographic images from three-dimensional data volumes and conventional computed tomographic scans in documentation and detection of liver lesions. The livers of 23 patients were examined by a multifrequency curved array transducer to acquire three-dimensional data volumes and by conventional computed tomography The ultrasonographic device was equipped with three-dimensional ultrasonographic technology allowing for real-time parallel movement in every plane within an acquired data volume. Axial ultrasonographic images reconstructed from three-dimensional data volumes were compared with conventional computed tomographic scans. When both methods were taken together, a total of 51 different liver lesions could be detected. Reconstructed ultrasonographic images depicted 44 (86%) of 51 lesions, and computed tomographic scans showed 46 (90%) of 51 lesions. Compared with computed tomography, ultrasonography depicted 5 additional lesions in 3 of the patients (4 hemagiomas and 1 unspecified lesion), whereas 7 lesions were missed in another 4 patients (4 metastases, 2 calcifications, and 1 cyst). The Pearson correlation coefficient between ultrasonography and computed tomography was r = 0.84 (P < .001). Our study shows that ultrasonographic images can be effectively reconstructed from three-dimensional data volumes. With respect to documentation and detection of liver lesions, the results obtained by three-dimensional ultrasonography appear comparable with those obtained by conventional computed tomography. However, several technical and procedural limitations have to be respected.