Abstract
Abstract. A comparison of aromatic hydrocarbon measurements is reported for the CENICA supersite in the district of Iztapalapa during the Mexico City Metropolitan Area field experiment in April 2003 (MCMA 2003). Data from three different measurement methods were compared: a Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometer (PTR-MS), long path measurements using a UV Differential Optical Absorption Spectrometer (DOAS), and Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization analysis (GC-FID) of canister samples. The principle focus was on the comparison between PTR-MS and DOAS data. Lab tests established that the PTR-MS and DOAS calibrations were consistent for a suite of aromatic compounds including benzene, toluene, p-xylene, ethylbenzene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, phenol and styrene. The point sampling measurements by the PTR-MS and GC-FID showed good correlations (r=0.6), and were in reasonable agreement for toluene, C2-alkylbenzenes and C3-alkylbenzenes. The PTR-MS benzene data were consistently high, indicating interference from ethylbenzene fragmentation for the 145 Td drift field intensity used in the experiment. Correlations between the open-path data measured at 16-m height over a 860-m path length (retroreflector in 430 m distance), and the point measurements collected at 37-m sampling height were best for benzene (r=0.61), and reasonably good for toluene, C2-alkylbenzenes, naphthalene, styrene, cresols and phenol (r>0.5). There was good agreement between DOAS and PTR-MS measurements of benzene after correction for the PTR-MS ethylbenzene interference. Mixing ratios measured by DOAS were on average a factor of 1.7 times greater than the PTR-MS data for toluene, C2-alkylbenzenes, naphthalene and styrene. The level of agreement for the toluene data displayed a modest dependence on wind direction, establishing that spatial gradients – horizontal, vertical, or both – in toluene mixing ratios were significant, and up to a factor of 2 despite the fact that all measurements were conducted above roof level. Our analysis highlights a potential problem in defining a VOC sampling strategy that is meaningful for the comparison with photochemical transport models: meaningful measurements require a spatial fetch that is comparable to the grid cell size of models, which is typically a few 10 km2. Long-path DOAS measurements inherently average over a larger spatial scale than point measurements. The spatial representativeness can be further increased if observations are conducted outside the surface roughness sublayer, which might require measurements at altitudes as high as 10 s of metres above roof level.
Highlights
The Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA-2003) field experiment conducted in the spring of 2003 was an extensive and collaborative scientific effort to update and improve the local emissions inventory, and to gain a better understating of the chemistry and transport processes driving atmospheric pollution in Mexico City (Molina et al, 2007)
This paper presents results from a more detailed comparison of Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometer (PTR-MS), Gas Chromatography/Flame Ionization Detection (GC-FID) and research-grade Differential Optical Absorption Spectrometer (DOAS) measurements of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at the Center for Environmental Research and Training (CENICA) supersite during MCMA-2003
Measurements of aromatic compounds were made at the CENICA supersite, an urban area of Mexico City, from 3 April to 2 May 2003 by a PTR-MS instrument, a research grade DOAS instrument and by canister sampling followed by GC-FID analysis
Summary
The Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA-2003) field experiment conducted in the spring of 2003 was an extensive and collaborative scientific effort to update and improve the local emissions inventory, and to gain a better understating of the chemistry and transport processes driving atmospheric pollution in Mexico City (Molina et al, 2007). Formal international comparisons between research groups using gas chromatography based systems for the measurement of non-methane hydrocarbons have been reported (Apel et al, 1994, 1999, 2003; Slemer et al, 2002; Volz-Thomas et al, 2002) These studies demonstrated that different calibration standards and analytical procedures could lead to significant differences between laboratories in the analysis of synthetic mixtures and ambient air samples. This paper presents results from a more detailed comparison of PTR-MS, GC-FID and research-grade DOAS measurements of VOCs at the CENICA supersite during MCMA-2003 These techniques measured several aromatic species in common over a period of 4 weeks and provide a much larger dataset for a statistically robust analysis
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.