Abstract
Both treadmill exercise and arm exercise are used for evaluating coronary artery disease, but arm exercise has lower diagnostic sensitivity. We compared the two exercise modalities with respect to the rate-pressure product at 85% predicted maximal heart rate, a parameter frequently used to denote performance of sufficient exercise to derive clinical conclusions. At this heart rate, treadmill exercise resulted in a significantly greater systemic oxygen consumption (2.7 +/- .8 vs. 2.1 +/- .6 l/min) and rate-pressure product (30.6 +/- 4.4 X 10(3) vs. 28 +/- 3.3 X 10(3)) than arm ergometry. An inability to generate sufficient imbalance of myocardial oxygen supply and demand may account for the relatively higher incidence of false negative exercise tests seen with arm ergometry, especially if the exercise test is stopped when the patient attains 85% predicted maximal heart rate.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
