Comparison of Arctic and Amazon regional governance mechanisms

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe Amazon and Arctic regions share many characteristics and governance challenges, despite their unique features. Both are delicate ecosystems, yet rich in natural resources, which fosters exploitation and habitation. Sustainable development is therefore critical for the long-term prosperity of local populations and global environmental and human health. This paper provides a comparison of the governance systems in each region in order to glean lessons learned for decision makers to advance stated sustainable development goals. We first discuss the structure and intended organizational impact on sustainable development of the primary multilateral governance bodies, the Arctic Council and Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization. Next, we present other regional and global organizations, including those from the private sector. Lastly, we assess specific examples of sustainable development efforts by these organizations in each region. From this analysis, three broad lessons emerge to advance sustainable development efforts through governance and policy: (a) the need for national leadership, (b) the importance of governance networks and, (c) the urgency for governance mechanisms to extend private sector-led accomplishments. These lessons are designed to offer regional leaders and policymakers options to achieve stated goals on local and regional scales.