Abstract

Groundwater has supported 70% of the water supply at the Lower Kelantan River Basin (LKRB) since the 1930s and demand for groundwater increases annually. Groundwater has been abstracted from shallow and deep aquifers. However, a comprehensive study on groundwater recharge estimation has never been reported. This study evaluated various methods to quantify recharge rate using chloride mass balance (CMB), water table fluctuation (WTF), temperature–depth profiles (TDP), and groundwater modelling coupled with water balance (GM(WB)). Recharge estimation using CMB, WTF, TDP, and GM(WB) showed high variability within 8% to 68% of annual rainfall. CMB is range from 16% to 68%, WTF 11% to 19%, TDP 8% to 11%, and GM(WB) 7% to 12% of annual rainfall, respectively. At 11%, recharge from GM(WB) was the best method for estimation because the model was constructed and calibrated using locally derived input parameters. GM(WB) is the only method involved with calibration and validation process to reduce the uncertainty. The WTF method based on long-term hydrological records gives a reasonable recharge value, in good agreement with GM(WB) and these methods can be paired to ensure the reliability of recharge value approximation in the same ranges. Applying various methods has given insight into methods selection to quantify recharge at LKRB and it is recommended that a lysimeter is installed as a direct method to estimate recharge.

Highlights

  • Groundwater resources are used by approximately 2.5 billion people in the world to support their daily needs [1]

  • The aim of this study was to apply and compare various methods to quantify recharge rate using chloride mass balance (CMB), water table fluctuation (WTF), temperature–depth profiles (TDP), and groundwater modelling coupled with water balance (GM(WB))

  • It can be said that chloride deposition is high during the dry season and vice-versa, which indicated that circulation of the south-west monsoon brings along high chloride aerosol to be deposited at Lower Kelantan River Basin (LKRB)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Groundwater resources are used by approximately 2.5 billion people in the world to support their daily needs [1]. Over exploitation of groundwater has introduced unprecedented groundwater stress problems in some regions. The greatest stress on groundwater occurred mostly in arid and semi-arid areas of the world [3,4,5,6]. Groundwater stress has triggered or exacerbated land subsidence, aquifer compaction, groundwater depletion, salt water intrusion, arsenic contamination, and groundwater quality deterioration, as reported for the Chao. The projection of global groundwater depletion during the twenty first century according to the influence of groundwater extraction costs and resources, ranges from 180 km3 /year to 480 km3 /year (restricted renewable water) and 110 km3 /year to 210 km3 /year (expanded renewable water), which is lower than the 2050 prediction and less than models predicted by [11,12] detailed in [13].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call