Abstract

BackgroundEdoxaban is a novel, potent and orally active direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor under development for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Properties of dose response and margin of safety of anticoagulants are the key factors for a positive risk/benefit of novel oral anticoagulants. ObjectivesTo compare the dose response of antithrombotic effect and margin of safety between antithrombotic and hemorrhagic effects of edoxaban with conventional anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin (UFH), dalteparin (low molecular weight heparin), lepirudin, and warfarin in rat models of thrombosis and hemorrhage. MethodsRats were treated with edoxaban, UFH, dalteparin, and lepirudin by continuous intravenous (iv) infusion, or with oral warfarin for 4days before inducing thrombosis or bleeding. Thrombosis was induced by inserting a platinum wire into the inferior vena cava for 60minutes. Tail template bleeding time was measured after making an incision on the tail. ResultsIn rats, iv infusion of edoxaban inhibited venous thrombosis in a dose-dependent manner. The other anticoagulants also exerted dose-dependent antithrombotic effects. The slopes of the dose–response curves of edoxaban were significantly shallower than the slopes of UFH, dalteparin, and warfarin. At supratherapeutic doses, edoxaban prolonged bleeding time in a rat tail bleeding model. To determine bleeding risk, the margins between antithrombotic and bleeding-time prolongation were compared. The margins of safety of edoxaban were wider than those of UFH, dalteparin, lepirudin, and warfarin. ConclusionsThese results suggest that edoxaban may be more easily controlled and has the potential for a more positive risk/benefit ratio compared to conventional anticoagulants.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call