Comparison of Anterior-Posterior Axis Versus Transepicondylar Axis in Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: One Technique per Knee

Abstract

BackgroundIn primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the preferred reference line for setting femoral component rotation is debatable. This study compared the anterior-posterior axis line (APAL) versus the transepicondylar axis line (TEAL) in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA using a measured resection technique where one reference line was randomized to each knee. MethodsThis prospective study compared the two reference lines using posterior knee referencing with a cemented posterior stabilized knee. The study included 32 patients with osteoarthritis with both knees having similar varus knee deformities. All patients had the same surgical procedure with the only change being the selected femoral rotation axis line. Patients were followed up for a minimum of two years. ResultsThere was no significant difference in any of the measured radiographic, operative, and clinical parameters, except for a postoperative radiographic limb alignment (APAL 179.7° vs TEAL 180.1° P = .04). The mean femoral external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis line (PCAL) was 3.0 degrees (0-7 degrees) using the APAL and 3.3 degrees (2-7 degrees) using the TEAL (P = .46). Two-year knee flexion and revised Oxford Knee Scores showed no difference. Seventy-five percent of patients stated no preference for either knee technique. ConclusionWhen using a measured resection, a posterior referencing technique, we found no difference in knee function and scores when setting femoral component rotation using the APAL versus TEAL. Level of Evidence2, Randomized prospective study.