Abstract
Objective To assess the safety and efficiency of Angioseal device in patients undergoing percutaneous femoral artery puncture in brain angiograph or interventional therapy. Methods A prospective trial was carried out in 128 patients undergoing brain angiograph and interventional therapy,in which 93undergoing brain angiography and 35 interventionsl therapy. All patients were divided into pure compression group by manual compression (83 cases) and vascular blocking group by Angioseal device (45 cases)according to different hemostatic measures. Results In angiography, hemostasis time of vascular blocking group and pure compression group was (1.8 ±0.8) min and(20.2 ±9.4) min (P＜0.01 ),ambulation time was (3.8 ± 0.8) h and (19.4 ± 2.2) h (P ＜ 0.01). In interventional therapy,hemostasis time of vascular blocking group and pure compression group was (2.0 ± 1.1) min and (24.5 ± 10.3) min (P ＜ 0.01), ambulation time was (4.3 ± 1.5) h and (24.3 ± 3.2) h (P＜ 0.01). Pure compression group had higher complication rate (such as bleeding,hematoma,skin ulceration and blister) than vascular blocking group (P＜0.01).Conclusion Angioseal closure device is safe, efficient and easy to use. Key words: Cerebral angiography; Femoral artery; Punctures; Hemostasis
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
