COMPARISON OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC AND OPTICAL SYSTEM DURING DYNAMIC MOTION

Abstract

Few studies have concurrently investigated the accuracy and repeatability of an optical and electromagnetic (EM) system during dynamic motion. The purposes of this study were to: (1) assess the accuracy of both an EM and optical system when compared to a gold standard and (2) to compare the intra- and inter-day repeatability during 3D kinematic motion of both systems. The gold standard used for accuracy assessment was a robot programmed to manipulate a carbon fiber beam through pre-defined motions within the capture volume of both systems at 30, 45 and 60°/s. A total of 12 healthy young adults were tested for intra- and inter-day repeatability of hip, knee and ankle joint angles during a sit-to-stand movement. Marker trajectories were captured using an 8-camera Motion Analysis system and a Polhemus Liberty system. Optical markers for both portions of the study were precisely marked to allow for digitization by the EM system, with collections taken at 120 Hz. Accuracy and repeatability were assessed using the RMS error and coefficient of multiple correlations (CMC), respectively. The optical system demonstrated a 1–2.5° lower RMS error in tracking the robot movements in the transverse and sagittal planes when compared to the EM system. However, it was possible that metal interference affected the accuracy of the EM system. High intra-day and inter-day repeatability was demonstrated by both systems during the sit-to-stand task. The optical system did demonstrate slightly higher CMC values for between day trials, though skin motion artifact might have affected the EM system to a greater extent. Overall, both systems demonstrated an adequate ability to track dynamic motion.